Showing posts with label AGING BEER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AGING BEER. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Barrel-Aging Techniques and Process: Second Nature Peach Sour Saison



There are a number of reasons that writing about beer for this blog has become more challenging since jumping into the commercial side of things for Kent Falls Brewing Co. Surprisingly, it's not even so much that the actual brewing process has changed. I found it relatively easy to scale everything up — that transition is something I want to write about more, and will, but I almost don't know what to say. Most brewing to me is a matter of intuition, and while there are plenty of technical and logistical things to work out, my answer to how I scale up my old concepts most of the time would be a big ol'  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

More challenging, in terms of writing about brewing, is that you start to think about each beer and the process behind it differently. Or at least, that's been the case with me, but the last year and a half of my life have been one never-ending mental breakdown, so who knows. Regardless, as a homebrewer, each batch felt more distinct, more of an individual project. One batch at a time, everything I made was a focused reservoir of my attention. It seems like it should be the opposite, but as a homebrewer, I felt way more obsessive about each beer I made, and for better or worse, far more inclined to poke and prod at it as I waited anxiously to know how it would come out.

I'm sure plenty of commercial brewers feel this way about every one of their commercial brews too, so maybe it's just the delirium and crushing existential crises warping my attentions, but brewing now feels more like a ride that I'm trying to steer than some little pet project that I'm micro-managing obsessively. Actually, though, I think homebrewing for long enough inevitably trains you for this too, especially homebrewing sours. You have to learn patience at some point. You have to accept that some batches, of the many carboys that once took up space in my incredibly nerdy and fascinating-to-visitors Beer Room, just have to be ignored for a good long while, and any attention you give them will probably do more harm than good. Scaling up to the point of having a thousand gallons plus of beer in barrels, this effect is exacerbated even more. No longer is this beer a singular, isolated project, but now a chain of events, a chain of 8 - 12 hour work-days, a series of vessels to transfer liquid between. Your attention becomes divided between numerous projects and a hundred points of stress and worry. For the same reason, some of these beers would be impossible to "clone," because there are so many unique steps and variables involved. You could mimic the process, but never the exact circumstances.

But here's the story of one such beer, the first real aged sour beer we've released at Kent Falls. I've done a couple different gose, our seasonal tart saison, and one previous barrel-aged release, a Brett saison with grapefruit zest. But we're finally just starting to dip into the whole barrel-aged sour thing, now that most of our barrels have contained liquid for at least half a year. To start, the barrel-aged saisons are going to fall into two releases. "Nature" will be a mixed-culture barrel-aged saison, always created from some new blend of barrels, and likely a bit different with each release. We'll release that possibly twice a year, or maybe just once a year, to really go for an annual vintage thing. Any fruited barrel-aged saisons will fall under the "Second Nature" name — again, pulling from the same selection of barrels, I'll pull some aging saison to receive fruit.

Even when homebrewing, replicating any one barrel-aged beer is going to be incredibly difficult without blending. Add to that the fact that I'm not necessarily going to try to recreate the exact same beer every time, and I have two dozen barrels to choose from (a very tiny number compared to many breweries) and you're starting from a baseline of endless variation: living beer in a living environment that's going to change and evolve over time. Like most of the barrels in the brewery right now, the two barrels that I selected for this peach sour were filled with liquid from our earliest batches of saison. Probably the most interestingly-different thing about my process for these beers is that the base beer was fermented out to a very low gravity before being transferred into the barrels, like 1.5 plato. Conventional wisdom is generally that you'll want to leave some residual sugar in the beer for the Brett and bacteria to munch on. Brett, however, really doesn't need much to eat to create its distinct character, and even just the autolysis of the yeast around it may be enough to feed it, especially in the oxygen-friendly environment of a barrel.

As a result, the beer resting in the barrel after four months of aging was not crazy sour. It had the pleasant flavor qualities of an aged sour, just minus the bracing acidity. This is pretty much what I was going for — "balance and approachable" seems to be an unstated theme of Kent Falls' beers, so I'm not trying to push my barrel-aged sours to be tongue-savaging acid monsters. I figured the beer would pick up a bit more acidity once it was on the peaches, though, and it did. We have two plastic holding tanks that serve as our fruiting tanks, for now. Some fruit I'm adding straight into the barrel: we picked some 80 lbs of local cherries for another such barrel-aged saison that's been aging since late summer. The cherries can stay in that barrel for as long as they want, as far as I'm concerned. Peaches, though, seemed like a royal pain in the ass to stuff into a barrel, so a plastic secondary tank was the solution we came up with for now.

This lead to one of the most fun (read: not fun) days of my brewing career. A few days before our hop harvest festival, during one of the busiest weeks of the year, and after spending a full day already brewing, I sat around hand-dicing 200 lbs. of peaches and throwing them into the plastic holding tank. I actually just slit the peaches in quarters but left them on the pit, so they held together as whole fruit, but with their flesh exposed. I figured as whole fruit, they'd be less likely to clog something up (a whole peach is larger than the opening of a butterfly valve), but slit, so the inside surface area would still be available to the beer. Anyway, that took until 3 in the morning, even once there were two of us going at it. Really fun, let me tell you.

The beer fermented out on the peaches surprisingly fast, hitting 1 plato terminal gravity in less than two weeks. We only left it there for about 5 weeks before bottling it.

And yet more variables that would be hard to replicate at home: I did absolutely nothing to sanitize the peaches, figuring it'd be nice to pick up whatever local microbes happened to be along for the ride. As a result, the beer went through a really happy pediococcus phase during bottle conditioning, which added complexity and enhanced acidity, rounding out all the flavors to great benefit. Now that it's ready for drinking (the pedio phase cleared up after about 6 weeks, thanks to the Brett hanging around), Second Nature - Peach has one of the best noses on a peach beer that I've had recently, with a perfect marriage of oaky vanilla character (much more than I expected to get out of these wine barrels, to be honest) and juicy fresh peach.

I'm very, very happy with how this one came out, and very excited to share this with everyone once we release it (at the New Milford farmer's market, December 19th, if you happen to be in the area). However, I have no clue how I'd share a recipe for this beer that wasn't utterly meaningless. Hopefully discussing the process (which really is the recipe, in this case) is somewhat helpful, at least. Beers like this, the product of scale-brewing and production schedules and McGuyvering and improvising and last-minute decisions and luck and timing and patience and terroir, are less like painting a portrait, one careful and deliberate brush stroke at a time, and more like some Jackson Pollock expressionist bullshit, dangling from a wire above a canvass, with a bucket of paint, just flinging shit in all directions and trusting that it's going to look pretty cool in the end.



Thursday, February 13, 2014

India Pale Aged Ale with Brett - Tasting Notes

India Pale Aged Ale with Brett



Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: Historic IPA / India Pale Aged Ale
Brewed: 
1.13.2013
Bottled On: 12.30.2013
ABV: 8.3%


Appearance: glowing gold, moderate head, slight haze, okay retention
Smell: classic Brett barnyard, dry tart fruit, orange citrus, cedar, musty wood
Taste: tangy, tart, funky fruit, orange zest, earth, juicy rich finish
Mouthfeel: medium-bodied, slight slickness, dry and drinkable


Early in 2013, I brewed up an experiment that I've been calling an "India Pale Aged Ale," taking the presumptuous step of coining an entirely new genre of beer to adequately capture the differences between historical IPA compared to its various (many various) incarnations today. While a large number of people have since read my article about the concept — and certainly many more have read Mitch Steele's fascinating book IPA, which inspired it — I'm not sure if the "IPAA" concept has caught on any more in the past year. Don't worry, give it time. We're not making history here, we're rebranding it. At least I can now comment on the results of my experiment.

Two things you're probably wondering. First, how is it? Well, if you've been paying close attention, you may have read about the ho-hum results from the first part of the experiment, in which I bottled a second brew of the original recipe fresh, minus the crucial Brettanomyces. That fresh version of historic IPA was rather disappointing — or more specifically, disappointingly malty, rather than hoppy. These historic IPAs used a massive dose of hops in the brew, and even a scaled down version is a match for any of today's American imperial IPAs. I get into a few theories on why the Brett-less version was less aggressive than I would have imagined over at that first post, but for a serious consideration of how such a beer may have been fresh, I'm going to have to rebrew.

Fortunately, aging a standard English IPA wasn't really the point of this project. One can pretty easily imagine how that turns out. The focus was my original version, aka IPAA, which was aged for almost a year with Brettanomyces before bottling. I'm happy to report: it's tasty. And it came out pretty how much I guessed it would.

It's interesting just how much the classic Brett character dominates this beer. Most drinkers probably first encountered Brett in Orval, or something like Orval, and we think of that profile as the classic, default Brettanomyces character. Well, this IPAA attempt resembles Orval a lot more than it resembles most modern IPAs. Funky barnyard is the first thing you get in the aroma and flavor, and the beer is decidedly tangy — the big citrus notes of orange and pineapple add much more tartness than I expected. This is far from a hop bomb. Brett C, which I chose because it is the originally-isolated British strain, gives the beer a very juicy profile. I harp on about Brett not making a beer sour, but clearly it can make it tart, and this is surprisingly far along that continuum. A medium / moderate level of carbonation allows the mouthfeel to remain mid-weight, still leaning slightly heavy on the malts, but the finish is dry and fairly viscous, leaving a bitter / sour note that's somewhat more aggressive than I've found in other Brett beers. Perhaps the best way to describe this is zesty, like the character of dried citrus fruit skins. For all that, it's fairly clean and pretty easy-drinking — more so than a lot of the heavy barrel-aged Brett stuff most breweries are putting out these days. With higher carbonation, I could certainly see historic drinkers describing this as champagne-like.

So the second thing you are likely wondering — and the most important thing, really — is: how closely does this actually resemble historic India Pale Aged Ale? And naturally, that's the hardest question for me to answer. I don't think any drinkers or note-takers back then used words like "funky" or "barnyard," and the character of Brettanomyces was simply the character of aged English beer, which makes it problematic when guessing at flavor profiles and the evolving language used to talk about beer. Nonetheless, this meets every main requirement as far as terminal gravity and aging conditions (one imagines the English were not drinking IPA that reeked of oxidized, BBQ-tasting hops), and fits into the very vague descriptions of IPAA from the time. And regardless, I'm taking this as another point of evidence that hops play a pretty large role in helping Brett to develop the huge ripe funk it's known for.

EDIT: Extraordinarily helpful commenter Gary Gillman shared an English brewing article from 1902 on the conditioning and carbonation of bottled beers, which briefly describes the character of pale ale stored in wood, then bottled and further maturated: "There can be no doubt but that such beers, brewed and bottled under most favourable conditions, present to the palate a peculiar pungent flavour and an invigorating freshness which is greatly esteemed amongst connoisseurs." I don't remember if Steele may have referenced this same article in his book, but the notes line up with his descriptions and with my own results. Indeed: "peculiar pungent flavour" with an "invigorating freshness" is exactly how I imagine someone in 1902 might describe such a beer. Furthermore, in the last week or so, a number of connoisseurs have tried my beer, and every one of them greatly esteemed it.

So I think I'm on the right track, though I have a few tweaks I'd make based on how the non-Brett version came out, based on some process discrepancies between my brew and the historic journey taken by the beer, and also based on some gut-instinct feelings I have. As mentioned before, the "Pale Ale malt" I used was probably too dark, and it seems Pilsner would actually be the best choice here. The primary yeast is still up in the air, though I wouldn't use West York again. And as hoppy as this batch was, it could have used more — the Brett-less version tasted more like a barleywine than an IPA, even young. India Pale Aged Ale was dry-hopped in the barrel during its voyage to India, something I failed to take into account and never got around to. While I don't know that I'll be able to emulate the barrel-aging process with a rebrew any time soon, it would be interesting to give this a "tertiary" aging period on oak-chips with a healthy dose of dry hops for a few months before bottling.

Given the success of this crude first experiment, I hereby declare brewers recognize that India Pale Aged Ale as its own style. I expect to see a bunch of "Beer Trends to Watch Out For" articles on this very subject in all the beer and food magazines within, let's say, three years. Everyone get on that.
Tasting notes for the version of my IPAA without Brett are here.

Friday, November 29, 2013

How Does Beer Age? - 1.5 Year Old 100% Brett Golden Strong Ale



Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: 100% Brett / Belgian Golden Strong
Brewed: 5.6.2012

Bottled: 7.16.2012
ABV: 8.4%


Appearance: light gold, great clarity, very little head, low retention
Smell: tart apple, pear, vanilla, mild hay-like funk, floral honey, slight acetic acid note
Taste: 
tart cider, tangy pear, floral honey, mild tropical funk, clean dry finish
Mouthfeel: tart, clean, oddly sweet finish, light body, med-low carbonation

I think it's safe to say that "Brett beer ages well" is pretty much conventional wisdom at this point. Brettanomyces was originally isolated from aged British beer, so immediately upon its discovery, it became associated with the character of beer aged in oak over extended periods of time. Sadly that character was almost immediately sanitized out of existence in most brewing cultures. Recent trends have brought it back, though I would say Brettanomyces is still not widely understood. Which leads me to 100% Brett fermentations: an extremely new development, I can't imagine there are many collectors out there with cellars of vintage 100% Brett beers. Primarily because so few commercial example exist, and those that are out there have not existed for very long. Guess that just means we homebrewers will have to try it ourselves.

On May 5, 2012, I brewed a beer loosely modeled after a Belgian golden strong ale, but fermented with Brett L and Brett B, aged on oak cubes, and with Orange Blossom honey making up a good bit of the fermentables (Belgian beers often use candi sugar for the same purpose.) The initial results were quite satisfying, though the beer was nowhere near what I'd call "funky." This was not a surprise — 100% Brett beers don't typically get very funky, despite what you'd think. The extended fermentation process — adding the honey in stages, rather than to the initial wort — also helped to ensure a relaxed, stress-free fermentation. I like my beers to have a clean and subtle approach, for the most part. At the same time, I knew this batch would be a great candidate for aging. At 8.4% ABV, it would have been a good cellar beer even as a standard Belgian, but the 100% Brett fermentation would give me the chance to explore something I'd never had the opportunity to explore before.

The results? Simultaneously promising, but also not super exciting. Truth be told, not a lot has happened to this beer since I bottled it over 16 months ago. I liked it then and I like it now, but the general profile is pretty much as I described it from the start. The fact that this is a Brett-fermented beer still isn't very obvious, at least in my opinion; it remains incredibly clean and devoid of barnyard. The goats decided to never show up, I guess. Instead, it's more of an orchard funk, with a tangy tart cider character in both the nose and taste; hints of apple and pear.

If anything has been summoned by age, it's a very slight acetic acid tang in the nose. This is quite different from the usual Brett 'funk,' however, and as subtle as it is, I don't remember ever tasting it when the beer was young. Even more interesting, I can't pick out that same character in the flavor; it appears to be purely aromatic.

Moving on the to mouthfeel, there is the subtle, difficult-to-describe 'thinning' of the body that I generally associate with aging of lighter beers. (I once tried a bottle of 1997 Corsendonk Abbey Pale Ale that tasted like a very light mead.) Here, though, it's only barely perceptible. It'll be interesting if this continues to 'lighten' with age, considering this was so light, clean and dry from the start. As a candidate for aging, it's an interesting beer as it almost defies transition — a beer that was designed to settle into its final form early on, neither falling off or adding on.

Of course, we'll see what this tastes like 5 years in.


For my original tasting notes from the fall of 2012, as well as the recipe for this batch, please click here.

Related Posts-