Showing posts with label OAK-AGED. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OAK-AGED. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
Barrel-Aging Techniques and Process: Second Nature Peach Sour Saison
There are a number of reasons that writing about beer for this blog has become more challenging since jumping into the commercial side of things for Kent Falls Brewing Co. Surprisingly, it's not even so much that the actual brewing process has changed. I found it relatively easy to scale everything up — that transition is something I want to write about more, and will, but I almost don't know what to say. Most brewing to me is a matter of intuition, and while there are plenty of technical and logistical things to work out, my answer to how I scale up my old concepts most of the time would be a big ol' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
More challenging, in terms of writing about brewing, is that you start to think about each beer and the process behind it differently. Or at least, that's been the case with me, but the last year and a half of my life have been one never-ending mental breakdown, so who knows. Regardless, as a homebrewer, each batch felt more distinct, more of an individual project. One batch at a time, everything I made was a focused reservoir of my attention. It seems like it should be the opposite, but as a homebrewer, I felt way more obsessive about each beer I made, and for better or worse, far more inclined to poke and prod at it as I waited anxiously to know how it would come out.
I'm sure plenty of commercial brewers feel this way about every one of their commercial brews too, so maybe it's just the delirium and crushing existential crises warping my attentions, but brewing now feels more like a ride that I'm trying to steer than some little pet project that I'm micro-managing obsessively. Actually, though, I think homebrewing for long enough inevitably trains you for this too, especially homebrewing sours. You have to learn patience at some point. You have to accept that some batches, of the many carboys that once took up space in my incredibly nerdy and fascinating-to-visitors Beer Room, just have to be ignored for a good long while, and any attention you give them will probably do more harm than good. Scaling up to the point of having a thousand gallons plus of beer in barrels, this effect is exacerbated even more. No longer is this beer a singular, isolated project, but now a chain of events, a chain of 8 - 12 hour work-days, a series of vessels to transfer liquid between. Your attention becomes divided between numerous projects and a hundred points of stress and worry. For the same reason, some of these beers would be impossible to "clone," because there are so many unique steps and variables involved. You could mimic the process, but never the exact circumstances.
But here's the story of one such beer, the first real aged sour beer we've released at Kent Falls. I've done a couple different gose, our seasonal tart saison, and one previous barrel-aged release, a Brett saison with grapefruit zest. But we're finally just starting to dip into the whole barrel-aged sour thing, now that most of our barrels have contained liquid for at least half a year. To start, the barrel-aged saisons are going to fall into two releases. "Nature" will be a mixed-culture barrel-aged saison, always created from some new blend of barrels, and likely a bit different with each release. We'll release that possibly twice a year, or maybe just once a year, to really go for an annual vintage thing. Any fruited barrel-aged saisons will fall under the "Second Nature" name — again, pulling from the same selection of barrels, I'll pull some aging saison to receive fruit.
Even when homebrewing, replicating any one barrel-aged beer is going to be incredibly difficult without blending. Add to that the fact that I'm not necessarily going to try to recreate the exact same beer every time, and I have two dozen barrels to choose from (a very tiny number compared to many breweries) and you're starting from a baseline of endless variation: living beer in a living environment that's going to change and evolve over time. Like most of the barrels in the brewery right now, the two barrels that I selected for this peach sour were filled with liquid from our earliest batches of saison. Probably the most interestingly-different thing about my process for these beers is that the base beer was fermented out to a very low gravity before being transferred into the barrels, like 1.5 plato. Conventional wisdom is generally that you'll want to leave some residual sugar in the beer for the Brett and bacteria to munch on. Brett, however, really doesn't need much to eat to create its distinct character, and even just the autolysis of the yeast around it may be enough to feed it, especially in the oxygen-friendly environment of a barrel.
As a result, the beer resting in the barrel after four months of aging was not crazy sour. It had the pleasant flavor qualities of an aged sour, just minus the bracing acidity. This is pretty much what I was going for — "balance and approachable" seems to be an unstated theme of Kent Falls' beers, so I'm not trying to push my barrel-aged sours to be tongue-savaging acid monsters. I figured the beer would pick up a bit more acidity once it was on the peaches, though, and it did. We have two plastic holding tanks that serve as our fruiting tanks, for now. Some fruit I'm adding straight into the barrel: we picked some 80 lbs of local cherries for another such barrel-aged saison that's been aging since late summer. The cherries can stay in that barrel for as long as they want, as far as I'm concerned. Peaches, though, seemed like a royal pain in the ass to stuff into a barrel, so a plastic secondary tank was the solution we came up with for now.
This lead to one of the most fun (read: not fun) days of my brewing career. A few days before our hop harvest festival, during one of the busiest weeks of the year, and after spending a full day already brewing, I sat around hand-dicing 200 lbs. of peaches and throwing them into the plastic holding tank. I actually just slit the peaches in quarters but left them on the pit, so they held together as whole fruit, but with their flesh exposed. I figured as whole fruit, they'd be less likely to clog something up (a whole peach is larger than the opening of a butterfly valve), but slit, so the inside surface area would still be available to the beer. Anyway, that took until 3 in the morning, even once there were two of us going at it. Really fun, let me tell you.
The beer fermented out on the peaches surprisingly fast, hitting 1 plato terminal gravity in less than two weeks. We only left it there for about 5 weeks before bottling it.
And yet more variables that would be hard to replicate at home: I did absolutely nothing to sanitize the peaches, figuring it'd be nice to pick up whatever local microbes happened to be along for the ride. As a result, the beer went through a really happy pediococcus phase during bottle conditioning, which added complexity and enhanced acidity, rounding out all the flavors to great benefit. Now that it's ready for drinking (the pedio phase cleared up after about 6 weeks, thanks to the Brett hanging around), Second Nature - Peach has one of the best noses on a peach beer that I've had recently, with a perfect marriage of oaky vanilla character (much more than I expected to get out of these wine barrels, to be honest) and juicy fresh peach.
I'm very, very happy with how this one came out, and very excited to share this with everyone once we release it (at the New Milford farmer's market, December 19th, if you happen to be in the area). However, I have no clue how I'd share a recipe for this beer that wasn't utterly meaningless. Hopefully discussing the process (which really is the recipe, in this case) is somewhat helpful, at least. Beers like this, the product of scale-brewing and production schedules and McGuyvering and improvising and last-minute decisions and luck and timing and patience and terroir, are less like painting a portrait, one careful and deliberate brush stroke at a time, and more like some Jackson Pollock expressionist bullshit, dangling from a wire above a canvass, with a bucket of paint, just flinging shit in all directions and trusting that it's going to look pretty cool in the end.
9 comments:
Labels:
AGING BEER,
BREWERIES,
CT BEER,
FARMHOUSE BEER,
GUIDES,
HOMEBREWING,
KENT FALLS,
LACTOBACILLUS,
OAK-AGED,
SOUR BEER
Thursday, March 5, 2015
Barrel-Aged Sour Saison on Doughnut Peaches - Recipe & Tasting Notes
Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: Sour Farmhouse Ale / Saison
Brewed: 4.24.14
Bottled On: 9.24.14
ABV: 5.6%
Life in a barrel, round two.
The first thing out of my beautiful new-to-me (used) 6 gallon oak barrel was a weird concoction, partly just to see if anything even weirder than what I was planning would arise. So I aged a 14% ABV Brett cyser in the guy. When that checked out, clearly its next passenger would have to be beer. And since its previous inhabitant had been funky, its next inhabitant would be so too. I'd committed this barrel to funkdom for life.
Many homebrewers don't get the chance to mess around with barrels. Small barrels have this annoying tendency to be both aggressively over-priced, and yet less practical in use than their bigger brothers, due to the drastically increased ratio of surface area. Which means they'll set you back a lot of dough, and yet you can't easily age in them the types of beers a brewer would be most inclined to age in a barrel. Like long-aged sours.
Fortunately, I brew a lot of sour farmhouse ales that only take a couple months to finish up. Just about perfect for small-barrel aging.
Sour saisons have become big lately, and I wonder if it's just because saisons in general really took off, and obviously we're going to try to sour just about anything, or if everyone realized the same thing at the same time: you can ferment out a sour saison in much less time than a lambic-like aged sour, and yet still achieve a beer that's complex and interesting enough to be worth the effort. Saison yeast are so highly attenuating that there's generally not a lot of residual sugar left for the other microbes to work on — meaning, theoretically at least, less time required. And sour saisons generally don't invite the entire complex ecosystem that most aged ferments have, so there's less of the long-term breakdown of complex sugars; more big pushes of initial primary fermentation. Since I incorporate Brettanomyces in mine, you still have at minimum the standard aging process of a Brett beer. But that's a matter of months, not years. Some sour saison blends use only Saccharomyces and lactobacillus, and those could probably finish up in weeks.
I've been tempted to move a long-aging sour into this barrel, believe me. I have a few going that would be solid candidates. The problem then, is, your barrel is now permanently an aged-sour barrel, as far as the cultures inside go. So you've either got to keep moving aged sours in and out of it, keep an aged sour in it for a while (until another is ready to fill it) and risk an ingress of too much oxygen, or else leave the barrel empty of beer for long spells in between brief aged-sour excursions. (Even writing all those logistical concerns out hurts my head). I've given this much thought, trying to decide what cultures I wanted to have a home inside this wood permanently. The sour saison culture (White Mana) living within now is, I'm pretty sure, the best possible tenant.
One of my favorite souring cultures, a barrel that had already proven to be reliable and trustworthy, and a good base saison. What else could a beer need?
Fruit, maybe?
And so I ventured to Fishkill Farms, one of my favorite local growers of Food, where I've also done a few homebrew demos and sauerkraut workshops. They're good people and take their shit seriously, so I knew they'd have something for me. Sure enough, I found not just beautiful peaches, but a type of peach I didn't even realize existed before: doughnut peaches. Look if you're just going to go ahead and combine two of my very favorite things together in one weird looking fruit, I am so on that.
Adding fruit to a beer in a barrel is a royal pain in the ass. The easy way would have been to cut the peaches into cubes and jam them through the bunghole of the barrel. For some reason that is no longer clear to me but was clearly the result of sheer stupidity, I felt strongly at the time that puree'ing the peaches would be the way to go. Cubing and dropping would have been much faster. But I got out my blender and spent a lovely Thursday evening covered in peach detritus as I blended, two liters at a time, and poured the puree into the empty barrel. Once the peaches were all blended up real nice and inside the barrel, I finally transferred the beer on top of them. Piece of
Actually, I remember now: I figured turning the peaches into puree would save me the trouble of potentially having peach cubes lodged in my barrel afterwards, impossible to remove. Shit, that was actually smart. I take back portions of the last paragraph. There might just not be a good way to easily add fruit into a barrel. At least this was just one 6 gallon and not dozens of 225 liter barrels. It's the small things in life.
Peach is notoriously subtle in beer, hard to express even in tame sours. An average for fruit in sour beer is probably somewhere around 1 lb per gallon. With peach, some brewers go as crazy as 4 lbs per gallon. I went with half that. The result, and the success, is subjective... as with so much in brewing. At first I felt this still didn't come out with enough peach character. Many I gave it to said that it had the perfect amount of peach character. As it aged, I came to agree: sure, it could be peachier, but the subtle nature of the flavor is perfectly balanced by the gentle acidity and smooth, richer oak character. Oak and peach together seems like a no-brainer to me, with the vanilla and lingering tannic structure from the barrel positioned just enough to compliment the fruit character, you've established one of the quintessential flavor pairings of the culinary world (peach and vanilla). And I think this is part of the reason that the peach itself doesn't have to be overwhelmingly present, but just present enough. What you want here is the third corner of a well-balanced triangle. There's a brisk, clean acidity, and some residual funk from the last occupant of the barrel: I'm actually quite surprised how much of the cyser carried over. It takes this maybe from a three-pointed beer to a four, but as all of the elements exist in harmony, I find it works quite well even with this unexpected additional dimension.
I found the main down-side to this "fruit in a barrel" business the hard way, when it came time to drink this batch. Pureed fruit still leaves lots of little bits and pieces, which mostly settle to the bottom of the beer by the time it's ready to package. But it would be impossible to avoid sucking them up entirely, and suck up many pieces of peach I did. As a result, the "late fills" off my bottling bucket received huge amounts of sediment. And as a result of that crazy amount of sediment, the bottles all gushed (tons of nucleation points for CO2 to start foaming) and poured like sour peach smoothies. The majority of the bottles, which have only a typical amount of sediment, are perfectly carbed. Except for the ones I bottled in these weirdly-shaped Belgian-cap bottles I love, which, apparently, my Belgian crown capper does not love. And as a result of that, some of those bottles pour basically flat. As a result of all of these things, this may be the most inconsistently carbonated batch of beer I've made in years. Sours are always a pain in the ass to carb properly and consistently, but my main takeaway: always use something to filter out fruit chunks. A fine mesh straining bag, or a steel screen like I use in my dry-hop setup, would both make a huge difference in the amount of gunk that ends up at the bottom of your bottles.
Then again, a sour peach saison smoothie isn't the worst thing in the world, either.
Recipe-
5.0 Gal., All Grain
Brewed: 4.24.14
Bottled On: 9.24.14
Fermented at room temp, 72 F
OG: 1.048
FG: 1.005
ABV: 5.6%
Malt-
72.7% [#6] Pilsner malt
12.1% [#1] rye
12.1% [#1] white wheat
3.1% [4 oz] acidulated malt (pH adjustment)
Hop Schedule-
0.5 oz Citra (old leaf hops) @FWH
Yeast-
White Labs Saison II
Hop Schedule-
0.5 oz Citra (old leaf hops) @FWH
0.75 oz Citra (old leaf hops) @flameout
Yeast-
White Labs Saison II
House Sour Saison Culture - White Mana
Other-
10 lbs Doughnut Peaches
Other-
10 lbs Doughnut Peaches
1 Oak Barrel
11 comments:
Labels:
BEAR FLAVORED,
BRETT BEER,
EQUIPMENT,
HOMEBREWING,
LACTOBACILLUS,
OAK-AGED,
SOUR BEER,
YEAST
Monday, March 10, 2014
Cigar City - Jai Alai IPA on White Oak
Brewery: Cigar City (FL)
Style: IPA / Oak-Aged Beer
ABV: 7.5%
Grade: A-
Age at Consumption: 1 Month
You might as well know, I'm a sucker for oak. The usual roundup of barrel-aged beers is immediately appealing to me, but I also love beers that break outside the mold and use wood as simply another element, a piece of the overall beer puzzle to be balanced alongside malts, hops and yeast. I've been chasing a few concepts for lower-ABV session beers pairing hops, dark malts and oak, but there are already a couple interesting commercial examples of that idea on the market. Dogfish Head has been doing Burton Baton for years now, and it's actually one of my favorite beers of theirs. Southern Tier and Great Divide offer regular oak-aged IPAs, but few breweries are as known for their wood experiments as Cigar City. Now, at long last, I've gotten to try Cigar City's version of Jai Alai IPA aged on white oak. In a can.
If you're looking for pure hops, this is not the beer for you. One reviewer on Beer Advocate lamented: "Dear Cigar City, aging Jai Alai on white oak is trying to fix something that's not broken, and ending up breaking it. Is it good? Yes, but it's nowhere near as good as the regular Jai Alai." They're not wrong, in that you could make an argument that regular Jai Alai is better than this, but I think taking a view that Cigar City is trying to fix anything about Jai Alai by brewing this is simply misguided. Jai Alai isn't in need of fixing — this is simply a different version of that beer, a separate entity that happens to share the name.
Despite the horrendous clip-art of hops featured on the can (another sad case of an ugly label for a beautiful beer), hops are not the focus of this — wood is. And the pairing of oaky tannins and sweet vanilla alongside fruity, vibrant, tropical hops creates something like an orange creamsicle, or maybe peaches and cream in rich liquid form. Or maybe both. Whatever this is, it's unique, inviting, and delicious. Oak-aged Jai Alai is just as refreshing as the regular, but in an entirely different way.
Everything here gives a surprising impression of sweetness, though I suspect the beer is not actually that high in residual sugar (not much more than your average IPA, anyway.) The oak brings such heavy impressions of vanilla that this can't help but taste like dessert. Another nice thing about those tannins backing it up: even at a month old, it's clear that this will age much better than the average beer.
Plenty of reasons for doing things differently — keep it up, CCB.
Availability: Year-round. 12 ounce cans.
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Wood Aging Experiment - Tasting Notes
Can a beer be cursed? Probably not. That's ridiculous.
How about wood, though: can that become cursed? Yes, definitely. The greater the surface area, the greater the risk of curse, in fact. Talk to any wizard or home-arcanist and they will tell you that the porous surface area of wood makes chips, cubes and honeycombs particularly susceptible to invasion from black magic, and therefore malignant curses.
Jeffrey Crane, of Bikes, Beers and Adventures, sent me these oak-alternative wood honeycombs almost a year ago. A number of us in the homebrewing community have been excited to try these things out, as their descriptions from Black Swan Cooperage sound extremely unique and enticing, with notes like toasted marshmallow, butter brickle and honey croissant. Jeff probably would have been the first brewer to try out all the wood variants, but his split batch designed to test them out fell prey to an infection, and so he deemed the results inconclusive. With the noble spirit of a true brewer, he tabled the project and passed along small cuts of the honeycombs to me. I brewed a batch of something-like-a-strong-ale and, post-fermentation, split it amongst 4 gallon jugs that also got four of the tastiest-sounding honeycombs.
So far I have yet to see any other brewer's trying out all these wood-combs together, for comparison. I've seen a few brewer's using one or two of them, but that's about it. So, I'm not finding much to compare to for other people's results. But to get back to the curse: I'm not very happy with any of these. Some are outright bleh, and the best (hard maple and maybe white ash) are simply okay. For a few moments, I thought the batch might even have gotten infected, just like Jeff's, even though I boiled the honeycombs more than enough to pasteurize them (with just that fear in mind.) But at this point, after I've given them so much time, I'm fairly positive infection isn't the issue at all. I'll circle back to some possible general problems with the beers later, but let's quick run through each wood-type.
Cherrywood opens up with sweet clean malts in the nose, pretty much what I would expect from a malty strong ale with some barrel character. There's a warning sign of some diacetyl, which was most likely a fermentation issue that the whole batch suffered from, despite my giving it plenty of time to clean up. Flavor-wise, this isn't too bad; something like poorly-made caramel candy. Black Swan's flavor notes for cherrywood are "butter brickle, ripe cherry, fresh grass, meringue, light fried bread/Belgian waffle." Most of those would imply sweeter, stickier flavors. I would say I am getting those notes if you took all those things and blended them together and added them to this beer, which is itself rather neutral. There's some promise, but not much complexity, and a bit of a cloying note in the finish makes this an okay-ish beer at best. None of the flavors stand out on their own, and the combined effect is too sticky and lingering.
Red Oak is as sweet as the Cherrywood version, if not more so, and the finish is once again the crippling weakness of the beer. It's both too-sweet and slightly tannic, which gives the whole thing a strange harshness. Underlying that off-note, you can pick out some sweet, fruity, caramel touches, some butterscotch, though nothing so specific as red berries (as mentioned in the description.) The overall effect is not horrible, but it's got one of those nagging off-notes that just ruins the drinking experience. Buttery hints of diacetyl in the mid-palate don't do the beer any favors, either, and some sips of this have an almost medicinal-effect, like barrel-aged Robitussin.
White Ash still has that same aroma: dry toasty crackers, buttered popcorn, slightly roasty bread, and mellow sweet malt. The stated description for white ash is "campfire, marshmallow, light grass, rising bread dough, light sweetness." As before, I could maybe kind of see how you could get some of those hints, but anything resembling such flavors jumps out in a big jumbled clash that, due to my own failings, is further muddled by a schmear of diacetyl. I could be mistaking the toastiness of the brew for campfire, the marshmallow and light sweetness for the general sweetness of the brew, and the light grass for the astringency all these brews seem to share. Put together, you have a harsh finishing note paired over a buttery sweet malt base. It's not outright bad, but it's far from great. Out of all of these so far, though, I can see white ash improving with some age, so I may return to this one later in the year.
Hard Maple is a bit of a surprise, after trying all the others first. Aggressive sweetness is a problem in all the variants, but the first sip of this one gives a jolting impression of melted old timey candy — one of those hard root beer candies, maybe mixed with some melted caramel candy. I can definitely see some syrup in this, though I don't know if it's distinctly of the maple sort. Nutmeg spice... maybe? The finish is actually on the cleaner side, despite the syrupy character that proceeds it, with less of the astringency that the others suffer from, and actually less diacetyl too. Hints of cherry and plum and grape make this seem like a bigger beer than it is — kind of like a quad minus the overtly Belgian aspects. This may be the most promising of all the variants, and I'll see how age affects it. Still, though I'm on the verge of kind-of almost enjoying it, there's something missing. Each of these beers just seems... dull, rather than off.
It's certainly been an interesting experiment. I think I suffered some bad luck with the base beer, and most likely, it would not have turned out great to begin with. Whatever happened with the yeast I pitched (a harvested yeast cake of Mangrove Jack's Burton Union strain, which I won't be doing again), the resulting diacetyl was definitely a major player in the beer's character. But given the notes that seem to be from the wood honeycombs themselves, it's hard to know what to make of them. I still think they have potential — guess I'll have to do a rebrew too.
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Session Black IPA on Oak Chips - Recipe & Tasting Notes
The Woods of Dunwich
Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: Session Black Ale / Black IPA
Brewed On: 11.25.2013
Bottled On: 12.8.2013
ABV: 4.3%
Appearance: thick tan head, impenetrable black body, lingering creamy head retention
Smell: chocolate, mocha, earth, pine, dank dark fruit, floral, wood
Taste: chocolate, bitter coffee, pine, mellow roast, sweet raspberry, cream, wood / oak
Mouthfeel: med-high carbonation, light bodied, crisp, lingering bitter finish
For a style that seems relatively obvious and inevitable conceptually, the black IPA sure has a contentious background. There's that whole issue of what to even call it in the first place, and then the debate whether highly-hopped export porters for India were black IPA before anyone got cute enough to name it black IPA. After all that crisis of identity, it's no wonder that most black IPAs are a mixed bag.
When designing a recipe from scratch, I try not to think about style as a series of checkpoints to be ticked off. I try to approach beers conceptually, with desired flavors and structure as the markers, and any avenue that gets me there worth at least exploring. There's a time and a place for any kind of brewing, and styles definitely exist for a reason. But it's important to remember that there are many ways to achieve a goal, especially in brewing, with the insane variety of ingredients and techniques available to us today. Maybe the problem with black IPA is that it just hasn't found its own identity: it keeps repeating echos of earlier ideas, without fully defining its weird hybrid existence. If your goal is an IPA that just happens to be colored black, or a thinner version of a porter, are those really a new direction? I feel that, without a solid premise to stand on, there's a lot more room to fall off into forgetability.
When thinking about brewing a black IPA again, after my first attempt this last winter, I decided to move beyond my attempts to match dark fruity hops (hops with 'black currant' and 'black raspberry' notes) over the black base. Instead, I wanted to embrace the blackness in a different way: a beer that focused on all the dark earthy woodsy flavors the style implies in my mind. Seeking out woodsy flavors brought me back to the piney, dank realm of hops, with Columbus and Simcoe. Pine with hints of berry was the goal. Certainly Columbus and Simcoe are nothing ground-breaking or unique for any type of IPA, but I think they convey the identity I wanted to pin down. After drinking this over the last couple weeks, I think "The Woods of Dunwich" could use even more pine, so maybe I'll keep searching around for one more piney variety to throw in the mix. I do like the bit of fruit that still creeps out from the underbrush: hints of sweet berry, becoming prominent more after some time had based and the initial bitterness faded. I leaned on Columbus for whirlpool hopping due to my success with it in this year's hoppy brown ale, and kept Simcoe to the dry-hop for maximum aroma impact. I don't know that that was necessarily the perfect schedule, so as always, I will continue to tweak and play around with timings.
But beyond the hops, one of my main ideas was to keep the thing sessionable. Sure, thoughts of the dark menacing woods imply strong, fortified flavors and warming booze, but I wanted to see if I could make this just as interesting as a session ale. Why not? — you still need day-drinkers in winter, too. And to me, the black IPA sort of screams for session strength. The expected mellow roast and extra body means a lighter, sessionish-version can put that complicated grainbill to use, keep up a medium body and slick mouthfeel, while remaining light and drinkable. Really, the same strengths of a dry Irish stout, just with hop flavor thrown in the mix, adding another dimension of balance. I think this goal was met — you probably couldn't tell this was of a lower ABV unless I told you, though thanks to the lighter body, my bitterness may need some re-calibrating.
And finally, for yet another element of balance, I couldn't resist pushing that woodsy element even further: oak chips. Again, the flavor combinations seemed like a natural, complimentary fit to me. Used conservatively, oak does not have to give a prominent whiskey flavor: it can simply add to mouthfeel, with slightly creamy and vanilla notes. I erred on the conservative side with my oak addition — 1.25 ounces of medium-toast cubes — and the beer could stand a bit more; as is, the oak imparted some nice flavors to round out the dryness of the finish, with little hints of subtle vanilla and wood. But since, as I mentioned, the beer came out a bit more bitter and drying than I'd like, I didn't quite nail the balance I was hoping for. I would tone down the bittering and nudge up the oak just a bit. I want the result to be semi-dry but creamy, semi-bitter and roasty but also sweet and rich with vanilla and dark fruit.
Ultimately, I'm not sure this was as much of a departure as I was thinking it could be, which is both good and bad. It's a success on the whole, I think, sticking the flavors I wanted, while at the same time still tasting recognizably like a black IPA. It's holding up well over the weeks, too. With maybe a little more oak and a finely-tuned balance, I think this could be marked as something truly unique. And even more: I think it makes the case that a black IPA, taking advantage of its extra malts, can evolve into a session beer worth perfecting.
Recipe-
5 Gal., All Grain
Brewhouse Efficiency: 78%
Mashed at 151 degrees for 70 minutes
Fermented at 65 F, slow rise to 68 F after 3 days
OG: 1.045 / 11.1 Brix
FG: 1.012
ABV: 4.3%
Malt-
65 % 2-row malt
12.3 % Golden Naked Oats
12.3 % rye
6.2 % Carafa III
4.3 % brown malt
Hop Schedule-
0.25 oz / 18 IBU Pacific Gem @FWH
0.75 oz / 18 IBU Pacific Gem @10 min
3 oz Columbus @0 + whirlpool 30 min
3 oz Simcoe dry hop 5 days
Yeast-
White Labs London Ale Yeast
Other Additions-
1.25 oz medium-toast American oak cubes
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Wine Yeast & Brett Fermented Oak-Aged Strong Ale - Recipe & Brew Day
Do you ever lay awake at night just thinking about the vast unknowns in the wide wonderful world of yeast? I know I do. In fact, it's hard to sleep at all, knowing how much yeast is out there unbrewed-with. Much of this excitement, as you may have noticed, is directed toward Brettanomyces, but it's helpful to remember that there are a zillion other fermentative microbes lurking on the sidelines as well, even within the realm of domesticated Saccharomyces. Take, for instance, "wine yeast," which happens to just be a smallish group of Sacch strains that got roped into fermenting juice-based beverages somewhere along the way. While most people are dismissive of wine (or "grape mead," as you'll hear it called in some haughty establishments) as a brutish concoction — fashioned by crudely smashing pieces of fruit together and tossing the mangled remains into a bucket — others may still glean some interesting tidbits from this arcane curiosity.
I got the idea to use wine yeast in a beer from reading an experiment by Chris Lewis over at lewybrewing.com, so hat tip for the inspiration. I also need to mention Shea Comfort, who was on the Brewing Network a few years ago giving an excellent interview about this entire subject, as well as oak-aging. Most of the information online regarding wine yeast-fermented beers can be traced back to Shea Comfort. I have listened to parts of that interview numerous times already, and will probably listen to it again within the next couple days.
One often hears of bottling beers with champagne yeast for their high alcohol tolerance and tendency to fart out lots of CO2 in almost any environment, but there's a lot more to wine yeast than a knack for carbonating bottles. The unique Sacch strains used to ferment wine are especially fascinating to me, as they possess some truly odd characteristics. Somehow, most wine yeast have evolved a "kill factor," a trait as deadly as the name implies. Drop a wine yeast into a beverage alongside a standard beer strain, and guess what? Your beer yeast is dead, all dead. Depressing and a little disturbing, right? How fitting that I am posting this on Halloween. It seems very odd to me that wine yeast specifically have developed this trait, whereas it's unheard of in the beer brewing world. I'm sure there's some explanation for why this would've happened in one fermentive environment and not another, but right now, it just seems like wine yeast is kind of a dick.
This killing enzyme thing would hardly even be an issue if you could just use it all on its own, except that wine yeast's other main trait is an inability to ferment maltotriose / maltose. When it comes to the sugars present in wine and mead, this isn't a factor, but in beer, the result will be a lot of residual sugar left over— what we brewers might view as a "stuck" fermentation about a 1/3 of the way from normal terminal gravity. Shea Comfort mentions a few work-arounds for this, including blending batches, and a commercially-available enzyme that breaks down complex sugars into simple, fermentable sugars. (I was not familiar with the specific product he mentioned, but I would imagine it does much the same thing as Beano). In one scenario, you have a beer that's only partially fermented with the wine yeast, and in another, you have a beer that's perhaps over-fermented due to the enzymatic breakdown of all complex sugars.
There is one 'catch' to the kill factor of these wine yeast: it only works on members of its own genus. And Brettanomyces — belonging to another genus of yeast — ain't care. Brett has no time for your precious grapes. So, this does two very important things for my jollies. For one, I get to brew a beer modeled vaguely after a wine, fermented with wine yeast, aged on oak, and then infect it with Brettanomyces, the worst nightmare for most winemakers. So: ha ha ha. Hahahahaha. Hahahahahahaha. Secondly, the Brett should happily munch away at all those residual sugars, eventually dropping the gravity of the brew down to where I'd like it, an acceptably dry terminal gravity. At least, that's the idea.
Here's what remains to be seen, though: will Brett do some weird and/or wonderful things with the esters of the wine yeast? It's hard to say. All my hahas and fun-poking aside, this experiment could very well end up terrible. I really have no clue how this will taste in the end. I am willing to entertain the notion that maybe winemakers fear Brett for a reason — that perhaps Brett plays weirdly with the esters of wine yeast, and will create much less agreeable flavors than it does in my usual beers. I don't think so, but it's certainly a possibility. The wine yeast is a rather large variable itself, flavor-wise. After pitching one packet of Lalvin RC-212 Dry Wine Yeast, I experienced furious fermentation the next day — actually one of the most aggressive fermentations I've ever seen, with an airlock that sounded more like machine gun fire. Rampant as it was, the smell was not great — somewhere between musty basement, old socks, and sulfur — and I can only hope that months of aging will bring out the cherry / berry fruit flavors I expect to achieve. The aroma was similar to some gone-wrong English beers I've encountered, but this one is going to be given plenty of time to morph into a beautiful butterfly; and anyway, I haven't even added the Brett yet.
But if this experiment is successful, I will absolutely be trying this on the other side of the color spectrum, using a white wine yeast in a pale farmhouse ale.
Recipe-
4.5 Gal., All Grain
Brewed: 10.25.2013
Brewhouse Efficiency: 76%
Mashed at 147 F for 70 minutes
Fermented at ambient room temp / 70 F
OG: 1.069 / 17 Brix
FG: 1.010
ABV: 7.8%
Malt-
61.4% (7 lbs) 2-row malt
26.3% (3 lbs) Munich malt
6.6% (12 oz) rye
3.5% (6.4 oz) Special B
2.2% (4 oz) Chocolate wheat malt
Hop Schedule-
0.5 oz / 17 IBU Northern Brewer @FWH
0.5 oz / 10 IBU Northern Brewer @20 min
2.2% (4 oz) Chocolate wheat malt
Hop Schedule-
0.5 oz / 17 IBU Northern Brewer @FWH
0.5 oz / 10 IBU Northern Brewer @20 min
Other-
0.75 oz American medium toast oak cubes
Yeast-
Lalvin RC-212 Dry Wine Yeast
Yeast-
Lalvin RC-212 Dry Wine Yeast
BKYeast C1 Brettanomyces
BKYeast C2 Brettanomyces
BKYeast C2 Brettanomyces
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Imperial Stout Aged On Oak with Rye Whiskey - Tasting Notes
Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: Imperial Stout
Brewed: 10.28.2012
Bottled On: 1.14.2013
ABV: 10%
Appearance: black, obviously. very little opacity at edges. thick, full, tan head
Smell: vanilla and oak, woody tannins, creamy milk chocolate, earthy spice, nutty malts
Taste: woody, earthy, vanilla, mild raisin / caramel sweetness, tannins, nutty, dry finish
Mouthfeel: highish carbonation, creamy, medium-full, prickly dry finish
I try to be as blunt as I can with my assessments of my own beer — what's the point in covering up a disappointing beer, when I'm the one who has to drink it all? If a batch has a few weak spots, there's no reason to give it a handicap, but I couldn't entirely help it with my latest stab at an oak-aged, whiskey-soaked imperial stout. The handicap? It's been almost exactly a year since I brewed this one. A year is a great amount of time to let most imperial stouts age, and a lot of them really come into their own in that time frame. But as the majority of that aging time was spent in bottles — something no commercial brewery could get away with — I was definitely giving this batch the most ideal possible conditions to come into its own, and my assessments earlier this year would have been a lot harsher. After all, an imperial stout should still be pretty good after four or five months —just even better after a year.
Appearance: black, obviously. very little opacity at edges. thick, full, tan head
Smell: vanilla and oak, woody tannins, creamy milk chocolate, earthy spice, nutty malts
Taste: woody, earthy, vanilla, mild raisin / caramel sweetness, tannins, nutty, dry finish
Mouthfeel: highish carbonation, creamy, medium-full, prickly dry finish
I try to be as blunt as I can with my assessments of my own beer — what's the point in covering up a disappointing beer, when I'm the one who has to drink it all? If a batch has a few weak spots, there's no reason to give it a handicap, but I couldn't entirely help it with my latest stab at an oak-aged, whiskey-soaked imperial stout. The handicap? It's been almost exactly a year since I brewed this one. A year is a great amount of time to let most imperial stouts age, and a lot of them really come into their own in that time frame. But as the majority of that aging time was spent in bottles — something no commercial brewery could get away with — I was definitely giving this batch the most ideal possible conditions to come into its own, and my assessments earlier this year would have been a lot harsher. After all, an imperial stout should still be pretty good after four or five months —just even better after a year.
The reason for the handicap? Fairly simple, and a very easy mistake with this type of beer: I over-oaked it. Not to the point of ruining the beer, but enough that those extra few months in the bottle really helped to out round off the oak, mellow the tannins, and integrate the flavors. So now, a year after brewing, it's drinking relatively nicely... considering all that. I'm hoping it will be even better in another year (or four), assuming the tannins fade at a faster rate than sweet vanilla notes from the wood. This was a very small 3 gallon batch, and went onto 1.4 ounces of medium-toast American oak cubes, for two months. You might guess that less oak for a longer amount of time would lead to more integrated, mellower flavors, and this may prove that theory by embodying the reverse. I hit it too hard, too fast.
Regardless of procedure, I still can't help but wonder if oak cubes and chips just don't impart the depth of flavor and nuance that a barrel does. This take is too harsh and tannic, too superficially 'woody'. Hints of vanilla and spice are there too, but have to compete with the harsher notes. While I still overall enjoy the oak character now that it has aged, it's definitely one-dimensional. And thinking about it now, I have yet to taste a homebrew — of my own creation, or anyone else's — that captures real barrel-aged flavor through use of chips or cubes. This is particularly true when it comes to bourbon barrels, and I suspect that it may be impossible for a homebrewer to reproduce the deep, ingrained flavor of bourbon that has been given years to soak into the vast porous network that a barrel offers. I would love to be proven wrong, but so far I haven't seen it. Soaking oak cubes into a jar of whiskey for a few weeks will be nice, but not the same. If you only want a mild, underlying touch of oak anyway? That seems more obtainable.
My other issue with this beer is, I hate to say, the recipe. I really don't know what I was thinking when I wrote this one up originally, but there's just not enough roasted character. I prefer stouts with a strong, dry roast, and much less of the prune / raisin character that caramel malts seem to inevitably produce in this context. My recipe featured a moderate percentage of chocolate rye malt, a smaller percentage of regular chocolate malt, and a very low percentage of roasted barley. There are various ways in which this recipe was perhaps over-complicated, but most glaring to me now is the lack of roasted barley as the leading harbringer of roast. The result is a beer that completely dodges the nasty cloying pruney sweetness of my first imperial stout (a Belgian take), but that errs too far in the other direction, dry and sharp and susceptible to competing flavors, like large doses of tannic oak.
Click here for the recipe and initial notes for this batch.
Regardless of procedure, I still can't help but wonder if oak cubes and chips just don't impart the depth of flavor and nuance that a barrel does. This take is too harsh and tannic, too superficially 'woody'. Hints of vanilla and spice are there too, but have to compete with the harsher notes. While I still overall enjoy the oak character now that it has aged, it's definitely one-dimensional. And thinking about it now, I have yet to taste a homebrew — of my own creation, or anyone else's — that captures real barrel-aged flavor through use of chips or cubes. This is particularly true when it comes to bourbon barrels, and I suspect that it may be impossible for a homebrewer to reproduce the deep, ingrained flavor of bourbon that has been given years to soak into the vast porous network that a barrel offers. I would love to be proven wrong, but so far I haven't seen it. Soaking oak cubes into a jar of whiskey for a few weeks will be nice, but not the same. If you only want a mild, underlying touch of oak anyway? That seems more obtainable.
My other issue with this beer is, I hate to say, the recipe. I really don't know what I was thinking when I wrote this one up originally, but there's just not enough roasted character. I prefer stouts with a strong, dry roast, and much less of the prune / raisin character that caramel malts seem to inevitably produce in this context. My recipe featured a moderate percentage of chocolate rye malt, a smaller percentage of regular chocolate malt, and a very low percentage of roasted barley. There are various ways in which this recipe was perhaps over-complicated, but most glaring to me now is the lack of roasted barley as the leading harbringer of roast. The result is a beer that completely dodges the nasty cloying pruney sweetness of my first imperial stout (a Belgian take), but that errs too far in the other direction, dry and sharp and susceptible to competing flavors, like large doses of tannic oak.
Click here for the recipe and initial notes for this batch.
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Wood Aging Experiment: Cherry, Hard Maple, Red Oak, White Ash - Recipe & Brew Day
The online homebrewing community is a wonderful thing for inspiration and information. Without fellow bloggers Jeffrey Crane and Chris Lewis, I might never have heard of the "Honey Comb Barrel Alternatives" offered by Black Swan Cooperage (website), a family-run cooperage in northern Minnesota (oh my god I am so happy that's still A Thing). Besides offering a variety of actual barrels in different sizes, Black Swan also sells eight types of wood "honeycombs". Designed specifically for homebrewers, these honeycombs are an intriguing alternative to the ol' chips, cubes and spirals. I guess the idea is that the honeycomb allows more surface area for contact, improving flavor extraction time (though I have no way to measure or confirm that).
Last year, Jeff wrote about a very similar experiment in his blog, Bikes, Beers, and Adventures. (Chris Lewis of Lewy Brewing has also used the honeycombs, though in a variety of different brews). Sadly, it looks like Jeff's conclusions were abandoned due to an infection taking over the batch. On the plus side, he is a true gentleman, and was kind enough to send me some of the remaining cuts of his honeycombs during a yeast trade. What a guy.
Though I am only brewing with four of them at the moment, Black Swan currently offers eight different wood types. Here are their tasting notes, per the website:
Cherry - Butter brickle, ripe cherry, fresh grass, meringue, light fried bread/Belgian waffle
Hard Maple - Maple candy, light spice-nutmeg, cinnamon, syrup, bread/bakery, cream hint of cocoa
Hickory - Honey, BBQ, hickory smoked bacon, apple sauce, cocoa coconut
Red Oak - Red berries, toasted marshmallow, light grass, baking bread, butterscotch
Soft Maple - Yellow cake, light smoke, banana, nut, toasted bread, hint of orange spice
White Ash - Campfire, marshmallow, light grass, rising bread dough, light sweetness (adds different mouth-feel dimension)
White Oak - Vanilla, toasted coconut, cinnamon, pepper, sweet baked bread, caramel
Yellow Birch - Toffee, butterscotch, honey croissant, light lemon, tropical fruit
So, yeah, I was pretty flush with excitement upon discovering all this delicious-sounding wood to play with. (Phrasing?) Brewers have typically stuck to the classic oak in their brews, and while it's possible to achieve quite a bit of variety from just oak by varying the toast and place of origin, we homebrewers are not known to stick with the first, most-obvious option presented to us. Barrel-aging is all the rage these days, and it's hard enough to find beers aged in anything other than old bourbon barrels. And don't get me wrong, I love the hell out of bourbon-aged beers, but variety is a huge reason craft beer is so great. How many breweries are aging beer on anything other than oak? Jester King, Cigar City, probably a few others that I can't think of.
Hard Maple - Maple candy, light spice-nutmeg, cinnamon, syrup, bread/bakery, cream hint of cocoa
Hickory - Honey, BBQ, hickory smoked bacon, apple sauce, cocoa coconut
Red Oak - Red berries, toasted marshmallow, light grass, baking bread, butterscotch
Soft Maple - Yellow cake, light smoke, banana, nut, toasted bread, hint of orange spice
White Ash - Campfire, marshmallow, light grass, rising bread dough, light sweetness (adds different mouth-feel dimension)
White Oak - Vanilla, toasted coconut, cinnamon, pepper, sweet baked bread, caramel
Yellow Birch - Toffee, butterscotch, honey croissant, light lemon, tropical fruit
So, yeah, I was pretty flush with excitement upon discovering all this delicious-sounding wood to play with. (Phrasing?) Brewers have typically stuck to the classic oak in their brews, and while it's possible to achieve quite a bit of variety from just oak by varying the toast and place of origin, we homebrewers are not known to stick with the first, most-obvious option presented to us. Barrel-aging is all the rage these days, and it's hard enough to find beers aged in anything other than old bourbon barrels. And don't get me wrong, I love the hell out of bourbon-aged beers, but variety is a huge reason craft beer is so great. How many breweries are aging beer on anything other than oak? Jester King, Cigar City, probably a few others that I can't think of.
Since I don't have the capacity to test out all of these at once, I picked four of the most intriguing-sounding to start with: Cherry, Hard Maple, Red Oak, and White Ash. This part wasn't hard, as I'll try out the rest eventually, and get longer honeycombs for the varieties I like enough to use regularly in recipes. Black Swan recommends using 1-inch of honeycomb per gallon of beer, which is perfect, as I planned to run the experiment by fermenting the base beer as a whole in one large carboy, and then splitting it amongst gallon jugs for aging.
The hardest part of this experiment was deciding what kind of base beers to toss the honeycombs into. Even though a light beer would have allowed for each variety to really shine through, how many times do you wood age a light, non-funky/sour beer? Sours and dark beers are almost always the intended target, though it would be awesome to run this experiment again sometime on something like a saison, or a pale 100% Brett session ale. But for now, I went with a vague dark-mild recipe; I'm not the best with "brewing to style," so I don't really know what to call it. It should be dark enough to capture the hearty character of the winter beers I'll typically be aging on wood, but not so dark as to wash out all of the wood nuances.
4.25 Gal., All Grain
Brewed: 8.26.2013
Bottled On:
Brewhouse Efficiency: 76%
Mashed at 152 F for 65 minutes
Fermented at 66 degrees F
OG: 1.057 / 13.9 Brix
FG:
ABV:
Malt-
69% 2-row malt
23% Munich malt
5.7% brown malt
2.3% Chocolate malt
Hop Schedule-
0.5 oz / 39 IBU Warrior @FWH
0.5 oz / 21 IBU Warrior @20 min
Other Additions-
1-inch wood honeycombs / per gallon
Yeast-
Mangrove Jack Burton Union - 800 ml starter
The Alchemist Heady Topper - 600 ml starter
Monday, August 26, 2013
Brouwerij Bavik - Petrus Aged Pale Ale Review
![]() |
| Old camera pictures: not so great. |
Brewery: Brouwerij Bavik (BEL)
Style: Sour Ale
ABV: 7.3%
Grade: A
Can you imagine how hard it would have been to sell a beer described as sour to Americans twenty years ago? Talk about a marketing conundrum. I've noticed on a couple occasions that many breweries that have been producing sour beer for more than five or ten years — in other words, that have been producing sour beer before the craft beer crowd made the style their new darling — often use "oak-aged" as a sort of evasive short-hand to let you know the beer is sour.
Take Petrus Aged Pale, for example: based on the bottle alone, you wouldn't have the slightest idea this was a sour, a wild ale, anything. According to the bottle, it's an "aged pale ale aged in oak casks"; a "golden blond ale" brewed with the finest malt, hops and water; and also a "specialty pale ale," with the beer's unique aroma and taste the result of "maturing in oak barrels for over 20 months." Three chances to describe the beer, and not once do they mention that this basically has the profile of a geuze. Given current popular trends, the marketing of this beer makes it sound like it was written by a brewer time traveling from the 1800's.
All this is amusing to me, and my critiquing is entirely good-natured — I hope Petrus Aged Pale doesn't shock too many unwitting drinkers expecting a light yeasty Belgian pale, because this is, in fact, a very fine sour ale. The fruity, lemony, funky sourness is really not so far from the likes of Drie Fonteinen Oude Geuze and Cantillon Geuze, though this beer is significantly easier to find, and cheaper too. What strikes me first is the incredible balance of complex, fruity funk with the sharper acidic tones. Any bitterness from the "pale" base of the beer has aged out, at this point, making the hops not so much a characteristic as a technique, and likely another marketing misdirection.
Carbonation isn't quite as high as many Belgian sours, but there's certainly enough to give the beer a lively, champagne-like quality. Petrus Aged Pale ends with succulent lemon, citrus, green apple and general tart fruit flavors, a relatively mild vinegar quality, and a nice puckering finish to keep you engaged. Oh, and who can forget the oak? Yes, as the bottle would like you to know — there's that, too. Unlike some, the sourness is never so intense as to wash out other flavors — Petrus Aged Pale is highly accessible, and deviously drinkable.
Availability: One of the few sours to come in fourpacks, and priced well too. 350 ml bottle.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Winter Warmer with Spruce, Maple, and Oak - Recipe & Tasting Notes
Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: Winter Warmer
Brewed: 8.19.2012
ABV: 7%ish(?)
Appearance: dark brown approaching black, good clarity, nice head
Smell: spicy pine and spruce, sweet malt, maple
Taste: spicy, strong spuce, maple sweetness, hint of roasted malt, bitter/astringent finish
Mouthfeel: medium/low carbonation, medium bodied, sharp, bitter finish
For the few of you that may actually be paying attention to the "Homebrew Recipes" tab on the blog, in which I list all my previous recipes and currently-aging homebrews, you may have wondered why "Three Trees" winter warmer was sitting in the "Aging" column for such a long time. It spent longer aging in secondary than any other clean / non-Brett beer I've brewed, and also received an incredible amount of attention and Plan B scenarios as I tried to improve it. So, now that I'm finally drinking it, I would like to first address a few main things right away:
1. Spruce essence is not of this world; no earthly substance could contain so much potency and overbearing flavor in such small doses. Spruce essence is an alien product and should immediately be investigated by the FDA and the FBI.
2. Considering how many "repairs" I performed on this beer, it certainly could have been much worse. So hooray for that. It's heavily flawed (more or less depending your threshold for spruce flavor) but, all things considered, drinkable. I recently had a spruce beer from a local brewery that was possibly worse / more potent than this.
3. I still think "Three Trees" is a good idea — a subtle pairing of oak, maple and spruce in a dark, malty winter warmer sounds great, doesn't it? The trick, besides not overdosing on the spruce in the first place, will be landing a balance between all four elements, being that one of them (maple) is fairly hard to bring out in a beer even on its own.
But let's start from the beginning, where the beer first went wrong: I wanted to brew this beer for the winter, and spruce tips were out of season at the time I started putting this together. If you're going to brew with spruce, I do strongly recommend planning out your beer in the spring, which is apparently the best time to harvest spruce tips. Bag some tips, vacuum-seal them, toss them in the freezer, and hang on to them for a few months before you brew. Do not bother with spruce essence. I had read extension reviews online warning of its potency, but I figured I would just play it safe and add the essence in very small doses, stepping up until I reached my desired flavor threshold. A reasonable plan, you might think. I just wanted a hint of spruce in the background, and the bottle recommends using a whole 4 ounce bottle for 10 gallons. Based on the dire warnings I read online, complaining that even one or two ounces were too much, I went with a quarter teaspoon for my 3 gallon batch, at flameout.
So the beer fermented. I gave it two weeks and took my first gravity reading and tasting. I fermented this (initially) with Conan yeast, to get a feel for its performance in darker beers, and the young beer was remarkably fruity. It tasted pretty much like peaches, which is what I expect of Conan, but I couldn't pick out any spruce character. Like, none. Fermentation must have driven off most of the character, I reasoned. So what would be a safe amount to add, to boost that spruce character? How about another quarter teaspoon of essence, bringing the total up to a half teaspoon? (Half a teaspoon!) And this I did, at the same time adding in the maple syrup.
Took a tasting a few weeks later, and wouldn't you know... my beer tastes like Pine Sol. From an additional quarter teaspoon. What the ****!?
Anyway, to shorten this sad story, the next few months were spent with various Plan B's, C's and D's meant to curb the insane spruce character. I added more maple syrup, aged the beer two or three months longer than I had originally planned to, and finally, brewed a small 1.5 gallon "blending batch," which I racked overtop the winter warmer, pitched a packet of fresh yeast, and let the whole thing "referment." I was pretty sure I hadn't tasted that first quarter teaspoon of essence because the original, active fermentation process scrubbed it off, so I figured adding fresh wort would drive out some of the flavor — besides also, you know, diluting it with extra beer. I was shocked to find how little effect this had, as if the spruce essence were itself a living presence in the beer, and just spread its way into the fresh wort without reducing in concentration.
But those counter-measures — especially the blending — must have helped some, as the beer is pretty drinkable now that it's been in bottles for about a month. The spuce is still aggressive: it dominates the initial flavor, and leads to a bitter, astringent finish. But once the beer opens up a bit, there's some nice, mellow-sweet malt character in between, with a pleasant but subtle mapleyness. More and more, week to week, it mellows out. While certainly not great, and a long shot from my original goal, I'm not having to choke it down or anything. It probably isn't even in my top five worst batches; actually, it's better than a lot of over-spiced / over-flavored beers from commercial breweries that I've had. In another year, who knows, it might actually be pretty decent.
One other thing that stands out to me as rather puzzling: where did the oak character in this go? Three gallons of this aged on an ounce of oak cubes for over three months, plus an additional month once I "blended" with that extra 1.5 gallon. Four months on oak is pretty long, and at that ratio, I would have expected a fairly strong oak character in the finished product. Maybe oak is reduced more by blending than spruce essence is? Maybe the spruce somehow just absorbed all that character? Dunno; I haven't actually nailed the oak character in any of my brews yet, so it's one thing I'll be trying to perfect over the next year. The creamy vanilla character and woodsy nuances of oak, layered with sweet maple and a hint of spicy spruce, still sounds incredible to me.
While I'm happy to drink a bottle of this every few nights, I'm also finding that it's good for baking and cooking. Adds a nice complexity to stuff like mac 'n cheese and soft pretzels. More on that later.
Recipe-
4.5 Gal., All Grain
Brewhouse Efficiency: 753%
Mashed at 150 degrees for 75 minutes
Fermented at 66 F in fermentation fridge
OG: 1.074 (diluted after blending)
FG: 1.011
ABV: ???%
Malt-
60.5 % Canada Malting pale ale malt
17.3 % Grade B maple syrup
6.9 % Simpsons Golden Naked Oats
5.8 % brown malt
5.8 % Munich malt
3.8 % chocolate malt
Hop Schedule-
0.75 oz Pacific Gem @FWH
0.25 oz Pacific Gem @15 min
1 oz Pacific Gem @7 min
Other-
1 oz medium toast American oak cubes (aged 4 months)
0.5 teaspoon spruce essence (half at flameout, half secondary)
Yeast-
Conan ale yeast
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Oaked Rye English Bitter - Recipe & Tasting Notes
Brewery: Bear Flavored
Style: English Bitter / Rye Ale
Brewed: 12.17.2012
ABV: 4.8%
Appearance: dark amber/bronze, very little head
Smell: oak, vanilla, nut, rye, biscuit, plum, pear, apple, brown sugar
Taste: rye, biscuit, nut, vanilla, oak, plum, pear, crisp sweet malts, mild roast
Mouthfeel: crisp despite low carbonation, slightly thin, slick
This brew marks a first at Bear Flavored: the first time I have rebrewed an original, specific recipe — not counting the many many IPA variations I have done, of course. While I am primarily an experimental / try-new-things homebrewer, there are a handful of "concepts" that I would like perfect sooner or later, and every year I'll probably brew a few of those beers until I get them where I want them. Back in April of 2012, I brewed an "oaked rye mild ale" that ended up pretty weird. Not undrinkable, and definitely not infected, but it had an odd, earthy character that I eventually decided was DMS (and in retrospect, I'm not even 100% about that diagnosis). I could pick out the potential of a solid beer underneath, and it was a concept that I wanted to work with more, so I decided to do a rebrew for winter. This rebrew has become an "English Bitter" in order to be at least slightly style-accurate, being that I'm quite over-zealous with my hopping rates.
Attempting to improve upon one of your own original recipes — which you already botched once — adds some extra stress and pressure, but praise be to Saccharomyces, I really like how this one came out. It's a total change-up from my usual hoppy and Brett beers, and aimed squarely at "session beer" territory with a 4.8% ABV, but it's not at all boring, or really even similar to many commercial beers that I can think of. Granted, I don't get to try too many English beers, but part of my inspiration for this was brewing something similar to Innis & Gunn, yet more complex and multi-dimensional.
I got the complexity part right, but if I have one upfront complaint, it's that my brew doesn't have nearly the lush, vanilla-y oak character of Innis & Gunn. I enjoy the oak character that is here, though it could stand to be a bit stronger, and perhaps smoother. Vanilla and oak come through clearest in the early aroma, with the flavor more along the lines of a sweet baking spice. Partly, this may be due to the rye and biscuit flavors the oak has to compete with: my mild ale is crackling with dry, bready, spicy flavors, and the oak blends in so well with them that it disappears a bit. I intentionally left out crystal malt or anything that might have brought some sweetness back into the beer, a decision I'm happy with, but could probably benefit from a bit more tweaking. This is one of the more spicy rye beers that I've had — though I should clarify that rye doesn't impart "spice" as the term normally implies, but a funky, earthy, dry character that doesn't have many comparisons. There's also a pretty strong backbone of bitterness, though it tastes more of rye and dry roast than hops. Biscuit malt and brown malt contribute a flavor of crackers and dry, biscuity bread, as well as a pronounced 'nut' character. In terms of pure nuttiness, this gives any "nut brown ale" I've ever had a run for its money. (It's very nutty). There are a great number of dry, bready, nutty flavors working together at once, and yet in harmony. Honestly, I prefer the complexity here over most commercial stabs at "session" beers.
I'm also rather happy with the performance of West Yorkshire ale yeast in this, and the resulting flavor and fruity esters. Fermentation went off without a hitch, attenuation was what I expected, and the beer is reasonably clear, typical of my more attractive homebrews. There are some nice fruity esters, vaguely pear and apple-like, though nothing overbearing or out of place. The slight fruitiness helps to balance the dry and bitter flavors some. On one hand, logic tells me that this would have to become a fair bit sweeter in order to have mass appeal; on the other hand, almost everyone I've had try this has given it an unexpected amount of praise.
I would not be surprised if I "finalize" this recipe somewhere close to where this already stands, but as usual, I already have a few tweaks and variations in mind. Next time, I believe I will reduce the rye and up the oats, so that both contribute in equal parts to the grainbill. My hope there would be for a creamier, slicker mouthfeel without a loss of complexity. With the brown malt and biscuit malt, I believe there are already enough dry bready flavors that the rye doesn't need to be featured so prominently. Finally, I would still like more oak character. I added 0.75 ounces of oak chips for the entire fermentation (almost 3 weeks), and then an additional 0.5 oz at three days before bottling. If I did the same batch size, I would add 1.25 ounces from the start — for 3 weeks — and go from there. (For a typical 5 gallon batch, I believe you could add 1.5 to 1.75 ounce oak for 3 weeks).
One last footnote: this was the last beer I brewed before getting a water report for Beacon. Fortunately, the extremely soft water doesn't seem to have significantly affected this brew, though it has the soft mouthfeel I've come to expect with my brews here.
Recipe-
3.75 Gal., All Grain
Brewhouse Efficiency: 73%
Mashed at 152 degrees for 75 minutes
Fermented at 68 F in fermentation fridge
OG: 1.048
FG: 1.011
Apparent Attenuation: 78%
Malt-
57.7 % Canada Malting pale ale malt
15.4 % rye malt
11.5 % brown malt
7.7 % biscuit malt
7.7 % Simpsons Golden Naked Oats
Hop Schedule-
36 IBU
0.5 oz Brewer's Gold @FWH
0.5 oz Brewer's Gold @10 min
1 oz Brewer's Gold @5 min
Yeast-
Wyeast 1469 West Yorkshire Ale Yeast
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
New Holland - Dragon's Milk Oak Aged Stout Review
Brewery: New Holland (MI)
Style: Imperial Stout
ABV: 10%
Grade: B+
You know what would be great? I'll tell you what would be great: a really solid bourbon-barrel aged imperial stout that's affordable and easy to pick up at the store without having to sic your bears on competing customers. Barrel-aged imperial stouts are easily one of the most hyped styles out there today — just look which beers get the wildest release days: CBS, Dark Lord, Surly Darkness, Black Tuesday, etc. I've read a lot of backlash against these beers — or more specifically, against their hype and the people who wait in line for them. Is the hype a bit much, at times? Yes. But the suggestion that these beers are popular without merit — that almost any similar beer will do — is kind of insulting too.
Case in point: New Holland's Dragon's Milk bourbon barrel aged imperial stout. It's a very nice, very tasty oak-aged imperial stout that I'm pleased as a pickle to have on the shelves in New York now. No stress, no price-gouging, just a pleasantly bourbony stout. It's hard to call a 10% bourbon-soaked imperial stout mild, but compared to others of the style, it kind of is. What it lacks in huge, memorable flavors, it makes up for by being surprisingly drinkable with very little alcohol heat. The nose is boozier than it tastes, and the bourbon and oak come through most clearly here, with a reminder that this is going to be sweet. And it is — sweet enough to actually undercut (or balance, depending how you look at it) the bourbon. Syrupy malts roll into a candy-like vanilla flavor, and the finish is sweet as well.
If Dragon's Milk has one significant shortcoming, for me, it's that the malt flavors are too generically sweet and syrupy, and lacking in the dark roast quality that might balance them out. The sweetness rolls out front, disappears under the oak and vanilla, and then surges back to create a long, sticky finish. It makes for a drinkable behemoth, sure, but also a beer that lacks depth. Don't get me wrong, I still like this a lot — it's better than some other bourbon barrel aged stouts that I've sampled lately. While overly-sweet, it's still reasonably balanced; it doesn't grate on you the more you drink. I'm happy to have this on the shelves.
If Dragon's Milk has one significant shortcoming, for me, it's that the malt flavors are too generically sweet and syrupy, and lacking in the dark roast quality that might balance them out. The sweetness rolls out front, disappears under the oak and vanilla, and then surges back to create a long, sticky finish. It makes for a drinkable behemoth, sure, but also a beer that lacks depth. Don't get me wrong, I still like this a lot — it's better than some other bourbon barrel aged stouts that I've sampled lately. While overly-sweet, it's still reasonably balanced; it doesn't grate on you the more you drink. I'm happy to have this on the shelves.
Availability: Rotating release. Both 22 and 12 ounce bottles.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Alltech's Lexington - Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale Review
Style: English Strong Ale
ABV: 8.2%
Grade: A-
Whenever I open up a bourbon-barrel aged beer and find it anything less than black, I'm a bit taken aback. But that doesn't really make sense — you don't need a stout to compliment barrel aging. Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale isn't much darker than some East Coast IPAs, but after a few sips, it's winning me over more than many of its roastier cousins.
With a lighter body and a milder beer character backing it, the bourbon has to be more balanced and subtle to work. The brewery could have easily screwed that up, but in my opinion, this hits a perfect balance and creates something I never really expected to find: a sessionable bourbon-barrel aged beer. I mean, sure, it's 8.2% percent, but that's nothing compared to some bourbon barrel aged imperial stouts, and most importantly, it tastes like you could drink three or four of these in a row.
Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale reminds me most of Innis & Gunn Original, much more so than American stouts like Goose Island's Bourbon County Brand Stout and Founder's KBS. It's got the mild, toffee-sweet flavor of a malty English beer, with no hints of roast or chocolate. The malt flavor has a clean sweetness to it — a sweetness that I actually enjoy, which is impressive — even if it's lacking in depth and complexity. It's a little lighter and less malty than a strong Scotch ale, but that should put you on the right track. What makes it work is the subtlety of the bourbon flavor — it sounds ridiculous to even write this out, but the flavor is almost what I'd call "delicate." Are you done rolling on the floor laughing yet? It's delicate, in the sense that all the flavors here are clear and bright and sweet, yet simultaneously understated, and brisk. Vanilla jumps ahead of the bourbon, and the oak helps give this a dry finish. A decent amount of carbonation moves the mouthfeel along, and despite the mild sweetness of the malts, the flavor drops off quickly, leaving a clean mouthfeel throughout.
Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale is clearly meant to be drinkable, rather than complex and challenging, so in that sense, they nailed it. 'Complex' doesn't automatically mean 'great' in every case, anyway; not if the flavors are a mess. My understanding is that Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale is something of a regional favorite in the south, or at least a niche regional favorite. A few bottles of it just appeared in New York — I'm not sure if this is going to be a regular thing, because I have yet to see it again, but I hope so. I'd happily reach for a glass of this again.
Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale is clearly meant to be drinkable, rather than complex and challenging, so in that sense, they nailed it. 'Complex' doesn't automatically mean 'great' in every case, anyway; not if the flavors are a mess. My understanding is that Kentucky Bourbon Barrel Ale is something of a regional favorite in the south, or at least a niche regional favorite. A few bottles of it just appeared in New York — I'm not sure if this is going to be a regular thing, because I have yet to see it again, but I hope so. I'd happily reach for a glass of this again.
Availability: Year round. 12 ounce bottles.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Sour Black Ale (American and Belgian Versions) - Recipe & Brew Day
How has it taken me this long to brew a full-sized batch of sour beer? I have a lot of excuses to offer, but in looking back on this year, it still seems odd to me. Sure, I did a few one gallon sour experiments last November with wort stolen from other batches, but those were probably ruined during my move from Brooklyn to Beacon, based on my recent samplings. I've already brewed a number of Brett beers, which allowed me to experiment with funk without waiting a year and a half to get the results. Over summer, I had a very limited amount of time to brew, and other experiments I wanted to get out of the way. Earlier this fall... well, you get the idea.
But now, finally, I have a real-live full-sized sour beer in the fermenter, and brew-gods willing, I won't have to move again before I bottle it. It's going to be a long time before I'm drinking the end result — and thus able to let you know if my recipe was any good — but I'll be tracking its progress on here until then.
Koschei the Deathless is a sour black ale, relying mostly on black wheat malt for color, with additional white wheat malt and golden naked oats for body and texture. Why go for something unconventional and likely overly-complicated, rather than a simple pale lambic-inspired sour? Well, it's in my nature, I guess. I want a sour black ale; sour black ales are exciting and interesting to me, so that's what I'm doing. But here's the most fun part, in my opinion: I'll be brewing two (almost) identical version of this within a month or two of each other. The first one, which I've already brewed, gets dregs from American sours. The second one, to be brewed sometime in December, gets dregs from some Belgian sours. There will only be one difference in the grain bill between the two worts — 1.8% black patent in the American version, versus 1.8% chocolate malt in the Belgian version — so any resulting differences will arise from the character of the microbes and yeast I pitch.
For Koschei #1, American Version, I pitched onto the yeast cake of a Belgian single with Brettanomyces that I bottled the day before, which contained a blend of Safale S-33 Belgian yeast, White Labs Brett L and Wyeast Brett B. For my souring microbes, I cultured dregs from a bottle of The Bruery's Tart of Darkness (another sour black ale) in a small starter for a few weeks before brew-day. Other homebrewers often just pitch the dregs right into the fermenting beer, but I wanted to sniff them out first (literally, sort of), and make sure they would be healthy and hungry. And, in any case, I also pitched dregs from a bottle of Russian River Beatification about a week after brew-day, so it should have a nice mix in there now.
For the Belgian version, I created "mini starters" in the bottle for 3 Fonteinen Oude Geuze, Cantillon Rose de Gambrinus, and BFM's Abbaye de Saint Bon-Chien (which very possibly won't be viable, given the extremely high ABV of the beer, but I'm hoping to at least get an extra Brett strain or two out of it). In addition to these dregs, I pitched half a packet of Cooper's ale yeast and a couple Brett strains from my own collection.
I also added 0.3 ounces of medium toast American oak cubes from the very beginning — I'm hoping that's a conservative enough dose of wood to emulate the long barrel aging process commercial sour beers often receive. Since I don't plan to rack to secondary — Brett is known to to eat up other dead yeast, so I'm not worried about it sitting on the trub — the beer will be sitting on the oak for a long time, at least a year. If it does get too oaky in that time, I can always change my mind about racking to a new carboy. And if it's not oaky enough — more oak.
Depending on the results, I may blend some portion of the two batches together. I might also age portions (possibly just the blended portion) on a small amount of blackberries, for a subtle fruitiness. But those decisions won't be made for many months.
And now, we wait.
Recipe-
4.4 Gal., All Grain
Brewhouse Efficiency: 79%
Mashed at 155 degrees for 75 minutes
Fermented at ambient room temp, 68- 70 degrees F
OG: 1.055 (American) / 1.052 (Belgian)
FG:
Malt-
60.2 % Canada Malting pale malt
9 % white wheat malt
9 % Aromatic
7.9 % chocolate wheat
6 % Simpsons golden naked oats
6 % Special B
1.8 % black patent (American) / chocolate malt (Belgian)
Hop Schedule-
7 IBU
0.75 oz Zythos @5 min
Yeast (American version)-
Yeast Cake: Safale S-33 Belgian Yeast, White Labs Brett L, Wyeast Brett B
1.8 % black patent (American) / chocolate malt (Belgian)
Hop Schedule-
7 IBU
0.75 oz Zythos @5 min
Yeast (American version)-
Yeast Cake: Safale S-33 Belgian Yeast, White Labs Brett L, Wyeast Brett B
The Bruery Tart of Darkness dregs
Russian River Beatification dregs
Brew Log-
11.5.2012 - Brewed Koschei American
Added 0.3 oz medium toast American oak cubes
Visible fermentation at ~30 hours
11.8.2012 - Added dregs from RR Beatification
12.9.2012 - Brewed Koschei Belgian
1.21.2013 - Koschei American at 1.015
Malty, mildly funky, mildly acidic. Thin, slightly bitter.
Russian River Beatification dregs
Yeast (Belgian version)-
Coopers ale yeast, White Labs Brett B Trois
Cantillon Rose de Gambrinus dregs
Coopers ale yeast, White Labs Brett B Trois
Cantillon Rose de Gambrinus dregs
3 Fonteinen Oude Geuze dregs
BFM Abbaye de Saint Bon-Chien dregs
Brew Log-
11.5.2012 - Brewed Koschei American
Added 0.3 oz medium toast American oak cubes
Visible fermentation at ~30 hours
11.8.2012 - Added dregs from RR Beatification
12.9.2012 - Brewed Koschei Belgian
1.21.2013 - Koschei American at 1.015
Malty, mildly funky, mildly acidic. Thin, slightly bitter.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Imperial Rye Stout Aged On Rye Whiskey / Oak - Recipe & Brew Day
In the past, I've avoided splitting up my recipe notes from my tasting notes, as many other homebrew blogs do. It seems like an unnecessary amount of work for a straightforward pale ale or IPA, and kind of confusing, putting the recipe out there before I even know if it's any good. But I know I have a tendency to get rambley and long-winded, and I'm sure I risk alienating some readers with the length of my recipe write-ups. So now that I'm doing more brews that require a long aging process, it seems neglectful to wait a year to get anything up on the blog. From now on, for certain beers, I'm going to start splitting up the brew-day from the tasting.
A couple weeks ago, I brewed an imperial rye stout to be aged on rye whiskey-soaked oak cubes (code-name "Black Lung.") A big oaky stout like this is something I hope to have in my repertoire of regularly-brewed recipes, although my first, 2011 attempt was a disappointment: too sweet and licorice-y, not nearly roasty enough, and with no noticeable bourbon character.
Excessive sweetness is a problem that a lot of imperial stouts — including many highly-rated commercial stouts — suffer from. To combat that this time, I avoided any caramel malts, added a pound of dark brown sugar to the grain bill, and pitched both Safale S-04 English yeast along with a small dose of Conan yeast, which boasts 80-82% attenuation, and should help to clean up a few gravity points of residual sugar. The brown sugar, along with the rye whiskey, should push the ABV to 10% or higher without finishing sweet and syrupy, while the chocolate rye and Simpsons golden naked oats in the grain bill, in addition to a high mash temp, should retain the thick body an imperial stout deserves. My main worry is that this will still come out too thin, but hopefully within a rebrews I can find a happy medium between body and balanced sweetness.
This will be the highest ABV beer I've brewed to date, but I'm fairly confident in my recipe. My strategy with high ABV beers that include sugar additions is to add the sugar in stages after the main fermentation has slowed, so the yeast has a smaller meal to attack at once, and doesn't get stressed from the outset. Here, I added a half pound of brown sugar after four days, another quarter pound a few days after that, and the final quarter pound around the two week mark. I started fermentation at 62 degrees F — keeping it on the cool side — and let warm up to 64 after the first brown sugar addition. Medium toast American oak cubes went into secondary as I transferred, where I'll let this age for two or three months, or until it's sufficiently oaky enough for me. I'll add the rye whiskey, to taste, a week or two after fermentation is definitely, completely done. Originally this was going to get bourbon, but as I was shopping, the rye whiskey caught my eye and I figured it would compliment the rye malt in the grain bill. If I'm really impressed, I'll keep it; if it doesn't make much difference, it'll be bourbon again next time.
One advantage homebrewers have over major breweries and their barrel-aging programs, is the ability to control how much whiskey is added to the beer without blending. A brewery cannot legally pour liquor into their beer, but homebrewers can, and usually have to — unless we shell out for a barrel. Many barrel-aged beers end up absorbing too much liquor, in my opinion, and can become drowned out by booze. But a homebrewed beer can accept a more subtle dose without having to worry about blending batches for balance. To that end, I hope to focus more on the oak (cubes) and less on the rye whiskey, with just a background of booze to compliment the flavors this beer would normally form anyway.
Hopefully, I'll be drinking the first bottles of this sometime in the spring, and aging the last few bottles of it for years to come.
Recipe-
3.5 Gal., All Grain
Mashed at 154 degrees for 75 minutes
Started ferment at 62 F, let warm to 64 F after one week
Started ferment at 62 F, let warm to 64 F after one week
Secondary at ambient room temp, 70 F
OG: 1.086
FG: 1.016
Malt-
64.5 % Canada Malting pale ale malt
OG: 1.086
FG: 1.016
Malt-
64.5 % Canada Malting pale ale malt
9.2 % dark brown sugar
7.4 % chocolate rye
7.4 % Simpsons golden naked oats
4.6 % chocolate malt
4.6 % chocolate malt
4.6 % Munich
2.3 % roasted barley
Hop Schedule-
100 IBU
2.25 oz Belma @75 minutes
Yeast-
Safale S-04 English Yeast
2.3 % roasted barley
Hop Schedule-
100 IBU
2.25 oz Belma @75 minutes
Yeast-
Safale S-04 English Yeast
after one week, pitched additional Conan yeast for higher attenuation
Brew Log-
Brewed 10.28.2012
Racked to secondary on 11.12
Added 1.4 oz medium toast American oak cubes on 11.12
Added 5 oz rye whiskey on 12.03
Gravity at 1.016. Flavor is a bit odd at the moment, more "woody" than "oaky."
Brew Log-
Brewed 10.28.2012
Racked to secondary on 11.12
Added 1.4 oz medium toast American oak cubes on 11.12
Added 5 oz rye whiskey on 12.03
Gravity at 1.016. Flavor is a bit odd at the moment, more "woody" than "oaky."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












